Is There a Purpose of Life? Essay

IntroductionBetween ages, creation stool metamorphosed to a different level with plethora of inventions and idiosyncratic fruitions, yet a univers all(prenominal)(prenominal)y acceptable answer to a prime indecision same whether there is a adjudicate of purport still remains as elusive as it had always been. Even the scientists too evade this question by saying science can all answer how alternatively than why (Meaning, 2008). This state of affairs has divided three schools of thought ace, who says there is no use of flavour, two, who refutes the claims of the former and the third, who stays away from this debate. thence this essay explores the views of the eldest and second schools of thought before coming to its avouch conclusion. at that place is No purpose of living. People who believe there is no purpose of life stress on intention rise to build their premise.Since there is no concrete evidence of why life manifests in so numerous forms or procreates, it usu ally generates the inference that there is no purpose of life. There is no point in underestimating the collective intellect of the major(ip)ity who regard themselves clueless nigh what it could be the meaning and purpose of life more often than not because they dont find all. Even the in-depth analysis of life could only determine the mathematical processes, but not a valid reason do-nothing it. After an exhaustive analysis of the question, NASA came to the conclusion that life, all life, is the attribute of any system that is a) capable of replication, b) capable of every conversion in distinguish to offset entropy and c) flying field to the process of evolution(Requadt, 2006)The prey-predator cycle in conclusion turns to a level playing field where each living serving shows its purpose as if either to utilize others or to be apply by others. This cannot serve any clue as to why this plucky is going on, as the entire game is based on molecular activity at various leve ls, involving uncountable elements and processes under various time frames. Thus this enormity of the process itself defies any set principle to hint roughly any purpose behind all these.There is no patent or universally acceptable proof that life stems from a angiotensin-converting enzyme condensed form of power (as God or any superpower) that exists on and on even after the death of a living being. Thus the concepts corresponding God creates living beings with a specific purpose or purposes argon mere hypotheses backed by belief. Belief cannot be cited as evidence and therefore theories involving God as the creator of life also relieve oneselfs eliminated.The arguments set by this school of thought clearly show that it does not accept any room to the individual human realizations regarding the purpose of life, as all piece do not certify such(prenominal) realization as commonplace experience substantiating the purpose of life on res publica. This brings up one point to t he fore that the difference among humans in cognitive skitter stops them to achieve or align same kind of realization or understanding intimately life or its purpose and thence this school of thought indemnifies only the findings on the objective level. However, this seems too one-sided, because the consequence of subjectivity in this issue is extremely important.There is Purpose of keepThe other school of thought that admits about life having whatsoever purpose chooses to subtend it as roughthing beyond ordinary comprehension and is far great than personal fulfillment (Warren, 2004). This school relies on the model of superpower having its own purpose running behind creation and maintenance of the flow of life on earth. This school of thought recognizes individual experiences on cognitive plane and uses that to substantiate their claim while arguing about the limitation of humans or other living beings to capture the big picture from objective angle.It is true that ther e is no dearth of instances that defies earthly logic, as for example, some accurate predictions done by individuals or psyche claiming to receive some idea in dream or experiencing strange feelings that indicates the existence of a superpower.DiscussionSince it is admitted that there are evidences regarding human inability to explain all the happenings on earth, it would be fair to say that if an issue (purpose of life) remains candid for so long, then it definitely hints at the inadequacy of knowledge that tries to define it.There is a distinct difference in analyzing a subject with limited range of knowledge (which is usually considered as rationality) and nominateing or realizing something on cognitive plane. As for example, the purpose of life from the biological perspective is unmistakable that it wants to maintain the identity of the form it takes (Luisi, 2008), though gradually metamorphosing to the tune of evolution. bit this trait also takes place on the temporal plan e of humans it cannot be explicit like its counterpart, as this development is intangible, where an individual reaches a new plane of realization on his/her own.While it is true that the individual account of any realization cannot be taken as a proof of the idea it presents, it cannot be ignored either. Then that would defy the process of development, which is evidenced by numerous human inventions that were initially considered as doddering imagination of the individuals. However, individual account of any new experience on the cognitive plane is hard to inject into another individual to get the same result, mostly because of the difference in cognitive ability and consequently the great divide among individual perception on anything persists all along.Therefore, intermittent individual accounts of certain realization about the practicable purpose of life, such as the accounts of some acknowledged great human beings who repeatedly told about a unique of discovery of our lifes c onnection with one supreme power, cannot settle the issue for once and all. As for example if someone says the purpose of life is to recreate yourself anew in the highest version of the grandest deal you ever had about yourself (Walsch, 1996), some impart believe it, some will refute it and some will refrain from commenting on it. However, not accept that there is a purpose of life will not prevent one from discovering it (How to, 2008).ConclusionPrimarily the question of whether there is any purpose of life commands the answer from the depth of perception about life. The above tidings clearly shows that the difference in cognitive abilities prevents humans to align their ideas about the purpose of life. While that seems disappointing, the increasing trend of overall temporal amplification among humans shows promise to settle this issue someday, as imagination and realization both command higher processing ability of all possible inputs including he ones that even defy the refe rence frame of the living beings of the earth that is, the reference frame of light. Over all it seems the discovery of the purpose of life depends on further manifestation of consciousness among humans or among the major part of them to establish it as a proven conclusion.ReferencesIs there a real meaning and purpose to life? weave document. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//guide.gospelcom.net/resources/meaning.phpHow to discover your life purpose in about 20 minutes. Web document. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/01/how-to-discover-your-life-purpose-in-about-20-minutes/Luisi, L. P. (2008). Does Science See A Purpose In Life? Web article. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//www.cts.cuni.cz/conf98/luisi.htmRequadt, W.E. 2006. The Meaning of Life. contain excerpt. Retrieved 2 April, 2008, from http//www.rationality.net/meaning.htmWalsch, N. D. (1996). Conversations with God An Uncommon Dialogue. Putnam Adult, 1st edition.Warren, R. (2004). Purp ose Driven Life. Zondervan Michigan, USA. Book excerpt. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//pddocs.purposedriven.com8088/docs/pdl/samplechapters/woeaihf.pdf